The performance increase is mostly about hardware optimization and the results will vary greatly depending on the configuration of the user's machine. Speed improvements in PureRaw 2 very much depend on the hardware and platform you are using to run it. I know, I'm dreaming, but if Adobe does offer similar function to Pure RAW in the future, good chance I will get my wish. eg, if sharpening seemed too strong, I could reduce it. In Photoshop, I could then see the changes and also adjust them. These layers would be optical corrections and sharpening. ie, the output would have 2, or more, additional layers. If I could have software custom made for me, I'd have a layered. I suppose, downloading a trial version and checking compatibility is an option, but they should just put a little more effort into providing that information, or, if this not just lack of attention to detail but a dishonest tactic, adopt honesty as a core value. I know: I can't trust their compatibility information.
I'm not too worried about time to process so I suppose it's less of a sting for me.Ģ/ Sony A7RIIIA and A7RIVA should heave been added by now So you are not even getting twice as fast, let alone 4 times faster as per their blurb.
I got Al Pacino'd.Īdobe when are you going to offer AI NR? My foot is still tapping. If DXO can do it so can they.Ī few years ago I got rid of all 3rd party software and said I'll never go back. Hope they improve their process of moving RAW files around one day. Both NN and DeNoise say their software is optimised for RAW files. I can edit as a TIFF or DNG but you can really see the difference when you open it as a RAW. If you edit both ON1 and Denoise as a RAW file the process is more cumbersome and you lose the colour profile options. PureRaw has huge advantage as it will edit as a RAW file and when back in LrC as a DNG you still have colour profile options. I have been using it lately and I really like the results. As a hobby shooter I can wait out the extra 13 seconds so I won't be updating this time and maybe never.īoth ON1 and Topaz just had updates. I do not see an IQ improvement and with all the complaints I thought they would have added some user control for sharpening. I'm trialling PR2 and it takes 17 seconds. I have PR1 which takes 30 seconds to process an R5 file. Excellent product but I've never been a fan of the company.
0 kommentar(er)
